cybersecurity

Why CISOs Struggle to Answer the Board’s Three Hardest Questions, and How to Fix the Report

/ , ,

CISOs often struggle to confidently answer boards’ key questions on security posture, financial exposure, and improvement because relevant data is siloed across multiple tools that lack shared context. A proposed solution involves adopting a unified intelligence layer that correlates identity, cloud, endpoint, and SaaS data into attack paths to critical assets, enabling reports focused on exposure and financial risk trends instead of activity metrics. This approach helps security leaders provide measurable risk reduction insights aligned with business priorities and facilitates more effective board communication and remediation prioritization.

https://thehackernews.com/2026/10/why-cisos-struggle-to-answer-boards.html

Why Are So Many Security Professionals Keeping Breaches Quiet?

/ , , ,

More than half of IT and cybersecurity professionals who experienced breaches in the past year reported being instructed to keep the incidents confidential, even when disclosure was legally required, according to the 2026 Bitdefender Cybersecurity Assessment. Organizations often hide breaches due to a culture of silence, the perceived high cost of disclosure, and attackers exploiting secrecy as a business model by negotiating quiet recovery deals directly with affected teams. Security leaders are advised to establish clear disclosure policies and foster a no-blame reporting culture to improve incident response and reduce the risk and impact of breaches.

https://thehackernews.com/expert-insights/2026/09/why-are-so-many-security-professionals.html

If It Weren’t for Humans, Your Security Program May Very Well Be Perfect

/ , , ,

A recent ASIS International research project highlights that security programs often face failures in controls like tailgating, propped doors, and shared credentials primarily due to human factors. Effective security requires strong employee support, executive buy-in, and a culture of security awareness where protocols balance security needs with employee convenience. Building this culture involves ongoing communication, accountability, purposeful training, and aligning security measures with business objectives to sustain and enhance organizational resilience.

https://www.asisonline.org/security-management-magazine/articles/2026/09/research-security-controls/human-security-controls-failures/

The AI Cybersecurity Arms Race Is On

/ , ,

Cybersecurity is entering a new era as AI-powered agents increasingly enable both sophisticated attacks and defenses. While malicious actors currently hold an advantage by leveraging agent swarms to probe and exploit vulnerabilities, enterprises face growing risks from exposed AI-driven systems and social engineering tactics using deepfakes. Experts argue that unrestricted access to advanced AI models for defenders is critical to counter this escalating arms race and prevent a surge in AI-enabled cyberattacks.

https://www.cio.com/article/4214149/the-ai-cybersecurity-arms-race-is-on.html

If You’re Not Using AI to Attack Your Own Systems, Your Adversaries Will

/ , , ,

AI agents are increasingly used by attackers to autonomously identify and exploit vulnerabilities at scale, creating a new, rapidly expanding attack surface for organizations. Security experts urge enterprises to adopt continuous, AI-driven red teaming and penetration testing to proactively find and fix weaknesses, as traditional periodic human-led testing is too slow and limited to keep up with AI-powered threats. The integration of AI agents into offensive security aims to stay ahead of adversaries who continuously use AI to attack systems, highlighting the need to treat AI agents as privileged identities within a zero-trust security framework.

https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/08/22/if-youre-not-using-ai-to-attack-your-own-systems-your-adversaries-will/5291346

Your Identity Governance Wasn’t Built for AI Agents

/ , , ,

AI agents challenge traditional identity governance frameworks because they do not fit neatly into human or machine identity categories, acting dynamically on behalf of users with shifting permissions. Current governance programs often struggle with visibility, ownership, and managing evolving access risks, making it critical for organizations to inventory non-human identities, enforce least privilege, and implement continuous real-time monitoring beyond periodic reviews. Security strategies must evolve from static identity validation toward adaptive governance that watches agent behavior to prevent unauthorized access as AI agents increasingly proliferate across enterprise systems.

https://www.cio.com/article/4212025/your-identity-governance-wasnt-built-for-ai-agents.html

3 Cybersecurity Issues That Should Keep Every CEO Awake at Night

/ , , , ,

Cybersecurity has shifted from a technical issue to a critical leadership challenge, with three key concerns for CEOs: the growing disconnect between executive perception and the complex reality of cybersecurity risks, organizational inertia that hampers adaptation to evolving cyber threats, and accelerating technological disruptions like AI, supply chain complexity, and quantum computing. These issues demand executive attention to governance, investment, and cross-functional coordination beyond traditional IT-focused approaches. CEOs must embed cybersecurity into overall business resilience and leadership to ensure their organizations evolve fast enough to meet the rapidly changing threat landscape.

https://www.cio.com/article/4199585/3-cybersecurity-issues-that-should-keep-every-ceo-awake-at-night.html

These Are the Most Urgent AI Risks, According to 272 Experts

/ , ,

A study by MIT FutureTech and the University of Queensland surveyed 272 AI experts to evaluate 24 AI-related risks from 2025 to 2030, identifying the five most severe as dangerous AI capabilities, competitive pressures, AI-enabled weapons and cyberattacks, power centralization, and misinformation. The information, national security, and finance sectors are deemed most vulnerable, with responsibility for addressing these risks primarily falling on AI developers and governance actors, while users and stakeholders remain most exposed. The research advises business leaders to integrate AI risk evaluation into governance processes continuously, recognizing AI as a paradigm shift requiring proactive and coordinated mitigation efforts.

https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/these-are-most-urgent-ai-risks-according-to-272-experts

Sharp Rise in AI Adoption for Cyber Defense Exposes Major Governance Gap

/ , , , ,

A recent SANS Institute survey reveals rapid AI adoption in enterprise cyber defense has outpaced the establishment of governance frameworks, with over 40% of practitioners reporting no formal AI policies and 60% lacking visibility into AI model use and data exposure. Despite 75% of security professionals holding governance roles, more than half indicate the absence of AI audit frameworks, highlighting a significant perception gap between security leaders and frontline staff regarding AI risk management programs. This governance shortfall raises concerns about protecting sensitive information amid expanding AI integration in cybersecurity operations.

https://www.ciodive.com/news/ai-adoption-cyber-defense-governance-gap/825462/

Resilience Through Cybersecurity Managed Services

/ , ,

The article discusses how organizations can enhance their resilience by leveraging cybersecurity managed services to address evolving cyber threats. It highlights the importance of partnering with specialized providers to ensure continuous monitoring, rapid incident response, and expert support, enabling businesses to maintain secure and stable operations. This approach helps enterprises improve their cybersecurity posture while optimizing resources and focusing on strategic priorities.

https://www.ey.com/en_fi/insights/managed-services/resilience-through-cybersecurity-managed-services

Scroll to Top