GDPR

GDPR: What We Already Know (and Don’t)

By / Blog /

Literature review on GDPR examines consumer and corporate awareness and knowledge of the regulation, revealing contradictions in findings. It proposes two hypotheses: (1) consumers are aware and knowledgeable about GDPR; (2) consumers lack awareness of the regulator. The overview highlights various survey results showing mixed levels of awareness across EU countries and suggests further investigation into public understanding of GDPR and its impacts on privacy perceptions.

https://hackernoon.com/gdpr-what-we-already-know-and-dont

Why GDPR-Style Regulation Needs an Upgrade: Lessons From Around the World

By / Blog /

GDPR-style regulations need updating as they hinder innovation and contribute to a fragmented digital economy. Current frameworks struggle with emerging technologies like AI and real-time data processing, resulting in complexities and ambiguous implications. The healthcare and financial sectors are notably affected, with outdated regulations causing data silos and stifled innovation. Recent fines illustrate the growing costs of compliance errors. Alternative models from countries like Estonia and UAE show possible paths forward. The EU is shifting focus toward competitiveness and innovation, urging organizations to actively engage in regulatory discussions and adapt to evolving guidelines.

https://accesspartnership.com/gdpr-upgrade-lessons-from-around-the-world/

Why the EU’s GDPR ‘Simplification’ Reforms Could Unravel Hard-Won Protections

By / Blog /

EU's GDPR ‘simplification' reforms threaten crucial data protection, prioritizing profit and regulatory speed over rights. Proposed amendments could weaken documentation requirements for companies, creating broad exemptions that risk privacy and accountability. This deregulatory trend undermines human rights and the EU's global leadership on digital rights, shifting focus from protecting individuals to corporate interests. Ultimately, the erosion of GDPR could set dangerous precedents, impacting data protection worldwide.

https://www.techpolicy.press/why-the-eus-gdpr-simplification-reforms-could-unravel-hardwon-protections/

Beyond WHOIS: Rethinking Domain Verification in a Post-GDPR World

By / Blog / ,

GDPR has enhanced user data protection but limited access to WHOIS domain registration information, complicating brand protection and cybersecurity efforts. Legitimate users now face obstacles in verifying domain ownership, while malicious actors exploit the lack of transparency. A new model balancing privacy and accountability is needed, with suggested approaches including tiered access systems, verified registrant frameworks, streamlined access requests, and collaborative policy development. The emergence of the EU's NIS2 Directive highlights the urgency for accurate domain data, driving the need for scalable, privacy-conscious verification solutions to restore trust in the digital space.

https://circleid.com/posts/beyond-whois-rethinking-domain-verification-in-a-post-gdpr-world

EDPB Releases Guidelines on Blockchain Personal Data Processing

By / Blog / ,

EDPB released guidelines on blockchain personal data processing, addressing GDPR compliance challenges due to blockchain's immutability and decentralization. It emphasizes clarified roles for nodes and advocates for minimized personal data use, encryption, or hashing to protect data, and off-chain storage for eraseability. Public consultation open until June 9, 2025, with expected consistency in final guidelines.

https://natlawreview.com/article/blocks-rights-privacy-and-blockchain-eyes-eu-data-protection-authorities

Status Check: Support Is Quickly Eroding for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework

By / Blog / , , ,

Support for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF) is declining. Recent deregulation and European concerns threaten its stability. Businesses must retain their DPF certification but prepare alternative data transfer methods. Key issues include the U.S. Privacy & Civil Liberties Oversight Board's weakened status and EU warnings about the DPF's adequacy. European regulators recommend “exit strategies” due to anticipated legal challenges, and advocacy groups are pushing for reduced reliance on U.S. data services. Overall, the landscape for transatlantic data transfers is becoming precarious.

https://www.thefirewall-blog.com/2025/05/status-check-support-is-quickly-eroding-for-the-eu-u-s-data-privacy-framework/

AI Chat Support and GDPR: Ensuring Data Privacy in Automated Conversations

By / Blog / , ,

AI chat support offers businesses efficient customer service but raises data privacy concerns under GDPR in the EU. Compliance requires clear user information regarding data collection, purpose limitation, and data protection principles. Chatbots must ensure transparency, minimal data collection, user data accuracy, timely deletion, security, and provide users control over their data. Mistakes can lead to fines and reputation loss. Platforms like Kodif streamline compliance through automation. Prioritizing GDPR compliance fosters customer trust and enhances business reputation.

https://techbullion.com/ai-chat-support-and-gdpr-ensuring-data-privacy-in-automated-conversations/

AI Chat Support and GDPR: Ensuring Data Privacy in Automated Conversations

By / Blog / , ,

AI chat support must comply with GDPR for data privacy, especially in the EU. Businesses should transparently inform users about data collection, limit data to what's necessary, ensure accuracy, and securely store information. Avoid common pitfalls like neglecting user consent and indefinite data storage. Tools like Kodif can streamline GDPR compliance through features like consent management, data anonymization, and audit trails, reinforcing the importance of data privacy as a competitive advantage.

https://techbullion.com/ai-chat-support-and-gdpr-ensuring-data-privacy-in-automated-conversations/

What’s Behind Europe’s Push to “Simplify” Tech Regulation?

By / Blog / , , ,

EU's push to “simplify” tech regulation aims to streamline its complex laws, raising concerns about diluting hard-won protections like GDPR and the AI Act. Amid geopolitical competition with the US and China, 13 member states advocate for deregulation, arguing it hampers innovation. Experts warn this may benefit dominant tech firms rather than smaller businesses and stress the need for a coherent strategy rather than unfocused deregulation. Fragmentation and ineffective regulation hinder innovation in Europe, signaling that reform should focus on coordination and support for startups, not dismantling existing protections.

https://www.techpolicy.press/whats-behind-europes-push-to-simplify-tech-regulation/

Biometrics in the EU: Navigating the GDPR, AI Act

By / Blog / , ,

Biometrics in the EU are regulated by the GDPR and the AI Act, which address the use of biometric technologies beyond security into areas like emotion recognition and employee monitoring. The GDPR governs the processing of biometric data as personal and, in some cases, “special category” data requiring consent. The AI Act categorizes biometric systems by risk, with real-time remote identification largely prohibited, and specific rules for emotion recognition and categorization. Organizations face complex compliance challenges due to overlapping regulations, requiring a nuanced understanding of technology and legal responsibilities.

https://iapp.org/news/a/biometrics-in-the-eu-navigating-the-gdpr-ai-act

Scroll to Top